Stationary subsets of inaccessible cardinals
WebPROOF. For a successor K, Jech [7] proved that every stationary subset of PK t can be decomposed into A many disjoint stationary subsets provided A is regular. It turns out that the restriction on A can be dropped. See [10]. Thus we may assume K is a weakly inaccessible cardinal. DiPrisco proved that every stationary subset WebProper Forcing Axiom implies the Singular Cardinals Hypothesis at κ unless stationary subsets of Sω κ+ reflect. The techniques are expected to be applicable to other open problems concerning the theory of H(ω 2). 1. Introduction The purpose of this note is to communicate the following results. Theorem 1.1. [11] (BPFA) There is a well ...
Stationary subsets of inaccessible cardinals
Did you know?
Webstationary subset of YK(A) can be split into A stationary sets. The main result of the present paper is the following. THEOREM. If Con(ZFC + there exists a supercompact cardinal) … WebSeveral situations are presented in which there is an ordinal such that {X 2 []@0: X \\!1 2 S and ot(X) 2 T} is a stationary subset of
Webweakly inaccessible cardinal, as a natural closure point for cardinal limit processes. In penetrating work early in the next decade, Paul Mahlo considered hierarchies of such … WebStationary many subsets of κ + whose order type is a cardinal and whose intersection with κ is an inaccessible cardinal Ask Question Asked 10 years ago Modified 10 years ago Viewed 349 times 5 Is anything known about the consistency strength of the following statement?
Webness and supercompactness in which δ holds for δ in a stationary subset A of the least supercompact cardinal. We may write A = A0 ∪ A1, where both A0 and A1 are stationary, A0 iscomposedofregularcardinals,and A1 iscomposedofsingularcardinals.Inourmodels, a weak version of holds for every infinite cardinal, various versions of the combinatorial WebApr 2, 2010 · α is said to be a Mahlo number iff every closed and unbounded subset of a contains an inaccessible cardinal. Prove that if α is a Mahlo number, then α is the αth …
WebMar 12, 2014 · Jech, T., Stationary subsets of inaccessible cardinals, Axiomatic set theory ( Baumgartner, J., editor), Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 31, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1984, pp. 115 – 142. CrossRef Google Scholar [5] tricot track pants for womenWebstationary subsets of µ+ reflect simultaneously (this follows from work of Eisworth in [3]). Here, we will consider these questions only in the context of inaccessible J´onsson cardinals, where the known results seem very sparse. Shelah has shown, in [9], that if λ is an inaccessible J´onssoncardinal, then λ must be λ ×ω-Mahlo. terrain gone in aramWebthe first inaccessible cardinal, there is a rigid system of 24 torsion-free groups of ... stationary subset of 2, then A can be partitioned into 2 pairwise disjoint station- ary subsets of 2. REMARK. The particular cases we need can be proven more easily. THEOREM 1.2. If 2 > N O is a regular cardinal, then there is a family of 2 x ... tricot windselWebWe obtain strong coloring theorems at successors of singular cardinals from failures of certain instances of simultaneous reflection of stationary sets. Along the way, we establish new results in club-guessing and in t… tricot wide strap slipWebThe existence of weak $\kappa$-Kurepa trees at every inaccessible cardinal $\kappa$ is consistent with the existence of very large large cardinals (including supercompact cardinals). This is discussed on page 33 of this paper by S. Friedman, Hyttinen and Kulikov. EDIT: As Boaz has pointed out in the comments, there is a mistake in my alleged proof. terrain guttering stockists near meWebcardinals in L [E] guaran tees 11 an y re ection p oin t of stationary subset inaccessible cardinal m ust b e 12 regular. The prop ert y that ev ery stationary subset of re ects at some singular 13 ordinal < or at an of xed uncoun table co nalit y, if consisten t with ZF C 14 m ust ha v e high consistency strength; ho w ev er the exact result ... terrain habitableWebNov 18, 2024 · By a well known argument, $\kappa$ is either the successor of a singular cardinal or an inaccessible cardinal. It is easy to see (and well known) that if every stationary set reflects in a regular cardinal then every $\kappa$-free abelian group is $\kappa^+$-free. ... This means that if we want the opposite, every stationary subset of … terrain gripper a/t g